Memaparkan catatan dengan label bahan umum. Papar semua catatan
Memaparkan catatan dengan label bahan umum. Papar semua catatan

Ahad, 21 Februari 2010

APLIKASI ANALISIS KANDUNGAN: SECEBIS PENGALAMAN SEORANG PENYELIDIK/PENELITI.

Oleh: Azmi Rahman.


Pengenalan.

Esei ini bukanlah merupakan suatu kertas yang gah terhasil oleh seorang sarjana/ penyelidik, apatah lagi kalau dinamakan seorang yang berpengalaman. Namun, atas semangat kesarjanaan dan keintelektualiti, saya memberanikan diri bercakap dan membentangkan secebis pengalamanan dalam usaha menyiapkan tulisan dan penyelidikan dengan menggunakan kaedah analisis kandungan yang berada dalam subjenis penyelidikan kualititatif. Bertitik tolak dari premis bahawa kita harus belajar dan berguru dengan orang lain, maka saya mengambil peluang dan kesempatan ini untuk belajar juga mengenai penyelidikan kualititatif khususnya menggunakan kaedah analisis kandungan. Contoh-contoh penyelidikan yang akan saya adalah penyelidikan dalam bidang kesusasteraan dan bahasa Melayu di peringkat Ijazah Sarjana dan Doktor Falsafah di dalam dan di luar negara. Kebanyakan hasil penyelidikan tersebut telah diterbitkan dalam bentuk buku ilmiah.



Metod penyelidikan : Kualitatif versus Kuantitatif.

Kedua-dua metod penyelidikan ini diaplikasikan oleh para penyelidik dalam pelbagai bidang ilmu. Malahan ada juga penyelidik yang menggabungkan kedua-dua metod penyelidikan dalam usaha menghasilkan dapatan yang lebih bermakna. Campbell (1956), yang mula memperkenalkan metod triangulation (triangulasi) dalam bidang sains sosial. Sebelum itu, triangulasi dipraktikkan dalam bidang navigasi, ketenteraan, pembuatan peta dan aktiviti tinjauan.



n Mentafsir kedua-dua jenis penyelidikan ini, tiada titik penamatnya.

(Dabbs, dalam Berg, 1989, h. 2 menyatakan bahawa, “Qualitative and quantitative are not distinct.”).

n Melihat objektif penyelidikan – yang tersurat dan tersirat ialah sumbangannya kepada bidang ilmu

n Setiap metod penyelidikan sama ada kuantitatif atau kualitatif pasti ada kekuatan dan kelemahan

n Dalam ruang kesarjanaan dan ilmiah, kita tidak mempertikaikan metod, analisis dan dapatan, apatah lagi jika penyelidikan tersebut telah diperakukan oleh para sarjana dan sesebuah institusi akademik dan bukan akademik.



Penyelidikan kualitatif?

Ada kalanya sebagai penyelidik, terpeta di mindanya sama ada segalanya adalah angka atau teks. Barangkali soalan dan penyataan berikut muncul di minda penyelidik.



n Apakah peranan angka dalam penyelidikan?

n Adakah dapatan mesti dibuktikan dengan angka?

n Adakah valid atau tidak valid dapatan kajian, kalau tanpa angka?

n Adakah angka boleh dimanipulasikan demi membuktikan dan membenarkan dapatan penyelidikan?

n Bolehkah kejujuran penyelidik dipertikaikan?

n Adakah kajian teks sepenuhnya sukar dimanipulasi dapatannya?

n Dapatan kajian adalah objektif dan subjektif = selari dengan teori, konsep atau model yang dinyatakan sebagai panduan.

n Teori dalam penyelidikan kualitatif dibangunkan tanpa angka.

n Bagaimana kalau dikatakan bahawa suatu teori terhasil daripada penyelidikan kualitatif dan tidak daripada penyelidikan kuantitatif? Contoh: Teori sastera Islam oleh Prof. Emeritus Shahnon Ahmad terhasil daripada penyelidikan/ pemerhatian/ pengalamannya terhadap genre sastera Islam, Teori puitika Melayu oleh Profesor Muhammad Haji Salleh, mengambil masa hampir satu dekad membina dan membangunkan sebuah teori estetik, berdasarkan pengalamannya/ penyelidikannya yang panjang ke seluruh institusi ilmu yang menyimpan dan mengajar bahasa dan kesusasteraan Melayu – di Jepun, di Jerman, di Amerika Syarikat, dan di England, Prof. Hashim Awang dengan teori psikoanalisis dari Barat, kemudian terbina teori psikoanalisis pewarnaan tempatan, Dr. Shafie Abu Bakar dengan teori takmilah, Mohamad Affandi Hassan sinonim dengan teori estetika tauhid, Mana Sikana mengembangkan teori intertektualiti, Dr. Sohaimi Abdul Aziz dengan gabungan teori klasik India dengan Barat, terbinalah teori rasa-fenomenologi, Dr. Umar Junus dengan teori sosiologi sastera (Barat) bukan teori mandiri, teori perang dalam sastera Melayu oleh Prof. Dr. Shahlan Mohd. Saman, Dr. Azhar M. Simin, dengan teori analisis wacana Melayu berdasarkan kata ‘yang’ dalam bahasa Melayu, dan sebagainya.



Analisis kandungan?

Holsti (dikutip dalam Berg, 1989, h. 224) menyatakan bahawa analisis kandungan ialah “any technique for making inferences by systematically and objectively identifying special characteristics of messages.”



Pada saya maksud analisis kandungan merangkumi aktiviti berikut:



n Membaca, meneliti, memilih, dan menyaring teks yang dikenal pasti sebagai bahan/ data penyelidikan.

n Teks termasuklah dokumen, buku, surat, elektronik mel, video, cd, foto dan catatan/ diari.

n Kandungan teks pelbagai, misalnya kata, frasa, ayat, imej, warna, aksi, dialog, bunyi, dan setiap yang tersurat dan tersirat.

n Analisis adalah secara sistematik, teratur dan bersandarkan suatu kerangka teori, konsep atau model.



Data bahasa dan sastera?

n Data mengenai bahasa dan sastera Melayu terlalu banyak dalam pelbagai genre, misalnya puisi, prosa, dokumen, surat, prasasti, dll.

n Ruang masa/ zaman bermula pratulisan/ lisan sehinggalah zaman kontemporari.

n Kebijaksanaan dan minat penyelidik menentukan arah penyelidikannya kerana ia melibatkan data/ bahan dan hal-hal lain berkaitan penyelidikan.

n Data yang sama di tangan penyelidik tetapi dimensi tumpuan penyelidikannya berbeza. Misalnya teks adikarya Melayu, Sejarah Melayu dan Hikayat Hang Tuah dianalisis dari dimensi pengurusan, sejarah, bahasa, strategi kepimpinan, politik, sosiobidaya dan pemikiran Melayu.



Titik bergeraknya penyelidikan: Teknik analisis kandungan.

n Berdasarkan penelitian, penyelidikan ilmiah di peringkat Ijazah Kedoktoran di IPTA, Malaysia terutamanya dalam bidang kesusasteraan dan bahasa Melayu, menerapkan/ mengaplikasikan sebuah/ kombinasi teori yang relevan.

n Teori sedia ada; teori sosiologi sastera, teori psikoanalisis, teori estetik, teori stilistik, teori kata kunci, teori struktural, teori intertektualiti, teori moral, teori simbolisme/ teori semiotik, teori wacana, teori simbolisme, dll.

n Teori yang dimodifikasikan. Contohnya teori rasa-fenomenologi, teori kata kunci, dan teori estetik bacaan.

n Teori baru/ teori mandiri terutamanya dalam bidang kesusasteraan Melayu. Contohnya ialah teori puitika Melayu, teori psikoanalisis tempatan, teori takmilah, teori intertekstualiti, dan teori SP4L.



Tahap-tahap analisis kandungan?


1. Kenal pasti bidang, misalnya kesusasteraan Melayu – pantun, mantera, syair, peribahasa, sajak, novel, cerpen, drama, dan lirik lagu.

2. Kenal pasti dan pengumpulan, penyaringan, dan penetapan data/ bahan kajian.

3. Kenal pasti teori yang relevan/ membangun teori/ mencanai teori/ mendekatkan teori dengan data/ memasukkan teori dengan data.

4. Kategorikan/ klasifikasikan – secara umum atau khusus mengikut subkategori

5. Analisis teks – peringkat penulisan.




Nota:

Tahap 1, 2 dan 3 mungkin saling berubah keutamaannya.



Rujukan

Berg, B.L. (1989). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (third edition). Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.



azmirahman

SalamSintok@

Sabtu, 20 Februari 2010

sample standard kualiti sekolah malaysia

boleh download daripada link berikut :

http://www.moe.gov.my/jns/skpm2.pdf

contoh borang indeks pengukuran pengajaran berasaskan Jemaah Nazir

Jumaat, 19 Februari 2010

FUTURE PERSPECTIVE - A Vision of Education for the 21st Century

SUMBER :
http://apps.emoe.gov.my/bpg/index.cfm?sector=news&page=read&newsid=313
FUTURE PERSPECTIVE - A Vision of Education for the 21st Century

Roger C. Schank

Technology is on the verge of fundamentally reshaping the American education system. In particular, the technology to deliver full-length courses online is rapidly becoming a reality. The creation and delivery of courses over the Web will be the driving force for educational change in the 21st century.

The computer will allow the creation of "learn by doing" courses designed by the best and the brightest experts in any given field. Quality universities will put their names on these courses, and companies will create them, guaranteeing employment to those who pass them. This will create tremendous change for everyone involved in the education system.

New role for teachers

The teaching of traditional academic subjects, first in high school and later in elementary school, will be increasingly done via online courses. Eventually school libraries will contain hundreds of these courses. Teachers will be left to provide things that technology cannot: personal one-on-one tutoring; teaching kids how to work in a group to accomplish something; and teaching crucial interpersonal relationship skills.
Initially teachers may feel disenfranchised by this. But an important opportunity will emerge for teaching social skills that students desperately need, and teachers will understand they need to be the ones to fill this role. Today there is a push to measure teachers by their students test scores. Tomorrow, teachers will be judged by more meaningful measures as we begin to value them for their human qualities.
Not only will teachers act much more as social workers or guidance counselors in the future, they will also lead courses that explicitly focus on developing social and interpersonal skills. In many ways these courses will resemble the kinds of programs provided by Outward Bound. The teacher will be an advisor to the team, or a guide on an expedition. Right now teachers are authority figures. Once teachers move out of that role, they will eliminate a roadblock that prevents them from connecting with the students who need the most guidance.

Changes in primary education

One of the biggest problems we have in elementary school is the amount of time kids are forced to sit still. Sitting still is so hard, and it s the last thing young children want to do. I d rather see kids spending more time playing than doing academics. While I think there is a valuable lesson in teaching a seven-year-old to sit down and focus on a task, that task shouldn t be doing 1,400 multiplication tables.
Elementary school should be simply about reading, writing and arithmetic, about acquiring good work habits, and perhaps most importantly, about instilling a love of learning in each child. A lot of what in today s school system is considered extracurricular, like putting out a school paper, ought to be the curriculum. Students learn more that way than any other way.

New roles for schools

We are moving in a direction where everybody is staring at a computer or a television all day and all night and not interacting with other people in a meaningful way. I think the schools will have to be the counterbalance to this trend, to actively provide opportunities for social interaction and to teach the skills required for successful interaction with other individuals. Part of the job of the school must be to help students learn how to work together and to be a functional part of society.

The school itself will evolve into a sort of student or community center, where kids are engaged in a variety of activities and projects. There will be a tremendous range of activities, but they will not be as purely academic as they currently are. When students are not participating in these activities, they will be taking online courses at home, or if the supervision there d'esn t allow it, at school.

Schools will become much more connected to the community around them as activities bring students more and more into contact with their community. They will also become more connected to local businesses, as students have the opportunity to engage in real-world jobs with local employers. The school will become the center of the community in a much deeper way than it currently is.

Centralization of curriculum and instructional development and academic tutoring

The advent of ubiquitous networking technology will lead to the centralization of key functions in the education system, just as it has in the business world. I see this happening in three key areas.

First, the delivery of education via online courses will change the entire landscape of course development and control of the curriculum. Each academic field will supply its experts to help create the courses in that field. Consortiums of academic experts, educational technologists, and businesses will work to develop, update, refine and improve these courses. As a society, we will be able to realize tremendous efficiencies by developing these top-quality courses one time only. We will also realize a tremendous improvement in course quality control. All students in the country will be able to select from a wide range of top-quality courses in any subject that interests them.

Second, the fiction of local control of education will become evident and a panel of education experts, rather than local groups of well-meaning, but uninformed parents, will develop the curriculum. There will be no point of local school boards arguing over which courses should or should not be offered, when every imaginable expert-built course is available. A central body, comprised of the country s best experts on education and learning, with representatives from the various academic fields, will assume control over the curriculum represented by the online courses.

Third, the advance of technology, in particular live videoconferencing, will lead to the creation of a centralized pool of tutors for various subjects. Just as today s companies have centralized phone centers where customers can call in for service, we will see the creation of one-on-one tutoring services provided via live videoconferencing. Having trouble with some calculus problems? Just connect to the calculus tutoring center for a face-to-face session with an expert tutor. These learning service centers will provide students across the country, no matter what community they live in, with access to the best coaches available.

How it will happen

Universities and their partners are beginning to develop and increase the amount of money being spent on online courses. Soon after they are made available at the university level, these courses will find their way to high school. Why? The most in-demand courses in universities today are freshman introductory courses: calculus, biology, physics, economics, psychology, etc. So, from an economic standpoint, it makes sense that these high-enrollment courses are likely to be the first online courses developed. These are the same courses that students are taking as Advanced Placement (AP) courses in high school. This will be especially attractive to those schools who can not offer all the AP courses their students wish to take [Editorial Note: This is already happening. See http:www.apex.netu.com].

Eventually it will be possible to take an entire first year of college in high school and receive college credit. Once this happens, the AP system as we know it will disappear. There will be no need to have an arbitrary test determine whether or not students get credit for a course. They will take the same course college freshmen are taking and get college credit directly. As I said, the availability of online courses in high school is going to happen slowly, but it s going to happen. It s easy to imagine that it may not be the case in two years, but it s much less easy to imagine that it won t be the case in five years.

Conclusion

The primary driver of change in our 21st century education system will be the creation of online courses that will remove the responsibilities for teaching academic subjects from teachers. Instead, teachers and schools will focus on combating the increasing social isolation that our society will face. Schools will become activity centers where students will work in groups on real-world projects, go on trips, and participate in the community. While students may also use schools as locations to engage in online course work, this course work will be just as available at home. The advent of online courses and associated networking technology will also lead to a centralization of course and curriculum development.
The Internet economy has created the "first movers advantage" the first to enter a new marketplace often maintains an advantage over competitors. Our country must seize the opportunity to be the "first movers" in creating a new approach to education.

Artikel ini diambil dari T.H.E. Journal oleh Mohd. Mokhtar Bin A. Majid untuk dikongsi bersama.

Posted By grafik_ipperlis on 2008-09-20 11:08:46.0 | Maklumat Umum
Reads: 671 |
:: KURSUS :: BAHAN :: MESEJ :: CONTOH :: MOTIVASI :: FORUM ::